Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Epidemiological Study of Congenital Anomalies and Risk Factors in Newborn Infants at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh

Md Zahirul Alam, Minhazur Rahman Tareq, Dildar Sultana Shapna, Mainul Hasan Sohel, Naila Rehnuma, Kawser Hamid, Md Mahabubul Islam Majumder

Keywords : Ambiguous genitalia, Anencephaly, Atrial septal defect, Bangladesh, Birth-defect registries, Chromosomal abnormalities, Cleft palate, Cleft lip, talipes, Congenital anomalies, Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, Cytomegalovirus, Duodenal atresia, Embryonic development, Environmental contaminants, Epidemiological profile, Epidemiology, External teratogens, Fetal development, Folic acid deficiency, Global Burden of Disease study, Hydrocephalus, Hypospadias, ICD-9, ICD-10, Infant, Inguinal hernia, Iodine deficiency, Iimperforate anus, Meningomyelocele, Micronutrients, Multifactorial transmission, Newborn, Patent ductus arteriosus, Pesticides, Polydactyly, Radiation, Rubella, Single-gene disorders, Spina bifida, Syndactyly, Tetralogy of Fallot, Tracheoesophageal fistula, Undescended testis, Ventricular septal defect

Citation Information : Alam MZ, Tareq MR, Shapna DS, Sohel MH, Rehnuma N, Hamid K, Majumder MM. Epidemiological Study of Congenital Anomalies and Risk Factors in Newborn Infants at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh. 2023; 2 (3):185-190.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11002-0071

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 26-09-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Background: Congenital anomalies are structural/functional defects in various organs (systems) that are apparent at birth. These anomalies originate prior to birth due to altered embryonic/fetal development. These are significant contributors to stillbirths/infant mortality over the world; the global variation in incidence is possibly related to regional differences in exposure to various etiological factors. Objectives: To investigate the epidemiological profile of various congenital abnormalities in newborn infants in Bangladesh. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Central Medical College Hospital, Cumilla, Bangladesh. We recorded 100 consecutive congenital anomalies in 54,800 infant visits in our outpatient clinics. Data were collected from families after informed written consent. Results: Out of the 100 infants with congenital anomalies, 69 infants were male and 31 were female (gender ratio 2.2:1). Congenital abnormalities were seen in the central nervous system (CNS) in 30, in the musculoskeletal system in 24, gastrointestinal in 24, cardiovascular in 13, and the genitourinary system in 9 infants. Thirty-eight infants had a history of antenatal exposure to radiation, and 35 of them to pesticides. Twenty-two were born to mothers with diabetes, and 18 to mothers with hypertension. Conclusion: We identified antenatal exposure to radiation, pesticides, maternal diabetes, and maternal hypertension as important predisposing factors for congenital anomalies. Congenital anomalies of the CNS and musculoskeletal/gastrointestinal defects were seen most frequently. Identification of risk factors can help in designing appropriate interventions.

PDF Share
  1. Ameen SK, Alalaf SK, Shabila NP. Pattern of congenital anomalies at birth and their correlations with maternal characteristics in the maternity teaching hospital, Erbil city, Iraq. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18(1):1–8. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2141-2.
  2. Ndibazza J, Lule S, Nampijja M, et al. A description of congenital anomalies among infants in Entebbe, Uganda. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011;91(9):857–861. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20838.
  3. Sitkin NA, Ozgediz D, Donkor P, et al. Congenital anomalies in low- and middle-income countries: The unborn child of global surgery. World J Surg 2015;39(1):36–40. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2714-9
  4. Lawal TA, Yusuf OB, Fatiregun AA. Knowledge of birth defects among nursing mothers in a developing country. Afr Health Sci 2015;15(1):180–187. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.24.
  5. El Koumi MA, al Banna EA, Lebda I. Pattern of congenital anomalies in newborn: A hospital-based study. Pediatr Rep 2013;5(1):20–23. DOI: 10.4081/pr.2013.e5.
  6. World Health Organization. Birth defects. Available at: Accessed on: 13 August 2023.
  7. Wang H, Bhutta ZA, Coates MM, et al. Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388(10053):1725. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31575-6.
  8. Kumar J, Saini SS, Sundaram V, et al. Prevalence & spectrum of congenital anomalies at a tertiary care centre in north India over 20 years (1998–2017). Indian J Med Res 2021;154(3):483. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1414_19.
  9. Gillani S, Kazmi NHS, Najeeb S, et al. Frequencies of congenital anomalies among newborns admitted in nursery of Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2011;23(1):117–121. PMID: 22830164.
  10. Ahmed W, Dey D, Farid R. Prevalence and pattern of congenital Anomalies and Its Outcome at Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu General Hospital. Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Med College J 2017;16(1):22–25. DOI: 10.3329/cmoshmcj.v16i1.34981.
  11. Hussain S, Asghar I, Sabir M-u-D, et al. Prevalence and pattern of congenital malformations among neonates in the neonatal unit of a teaching hospital. J Pak Med Assoc 2014;64(6):629–634. PMID: 25252479.
  12. Obu HA, Chinawa JM, Uleanya ND, et al. Congenital malformations among newborns admitted in the neonatal unit of a tertiary hospital in Enugu, South–East Nigeria: A retrospective study. BMC Res Notes 2012;5(1):1–6. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-177. Corpus ID: 51843039.
  13. Bastola R, Gurung R, Bastola BS, et al. Pattern and prevalence of congenital birth defect among neonates admitted to special newborn care unit (SNCU) of Pokhara Academy of Health Science (PAHS), Nepal J Biol Med Res 2017;2(1):1. Corpus ID: 51843039.
  14. Tayebi N, Yazdani K, Naghshin N. The prevalence of congenital malformations and its correlation with consanguineous marriages. Oman Med J 2010;25(1):37–40. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2010.9.
  15. Akinmoladun JA, Famosaya ID, Ogbole GI. Pattern and distribution of prenatally diagnosed congenital anomalies among high risk pregnant women in Ibadan, South Western Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J 2022;41:66. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.66.28874.
  16. Jain SR, Naik JD, Dhakne BR, et al. Pattern of congenital malformations in newborn: A hospital-based study. Int J Res Med Sci 2016;4(2): 524–528. DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20160308.
  17. Feldkamp ML, Carey JC, Byrne JLB, et al. Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: Population based study. BMJ 2017;357:j2249. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j2249.
  18. Sarkar S, Patra C, Dasgupta MK, et al. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in neonates and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. J Clin Neonatol 2013;2(3):131–134. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4847.119998.
  19. Abebe S, Gebru G, Amenu D, et al. Risk factors associated with congenital anomalies among newborns in southwestern Ethiopia: A case–control study. PLoS One 2021;16(1):e0245915. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245915.
  20. Biswas A, Anderson R, Doraiswamy S, et al. Timely referral saves the lives of mothers and newborns: Midwifery led continuum of care in marginalized teagarden communities – A qualitative case study in Bangladesh 2018;7:365. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.13605.1.
  21. Bashir A. Congenital malformations: Prenatal diagnosis and management. Am J Biomed Sci Res 2019;2(1):24–27. DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.02.000565.
  22. Higurashi M, Iijima K, Sugimoto Y, et al. The birth prevalence of malformation syndromes in Tokyo infants: A survey of 14,430 newborn infants. Am J Med Genet 1980;6(3):189–194. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320060303.
  23. Rasmussen SA, Olney RS, Holmes LB, et al. Guidelines for case classification for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2003;67(3):193–201. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.10012.
  24. Rasmussen SA, Moore CA. Effective coding in birth defects surveillance. Teratology 2001;64(Suppl. 1):S3–S7. DOI: 10.1002/tera.1077.
  25. Boyle B, Addor MC, Arriola L, et al. Estimating global burden of disease due to congenital anomaly: An analysis of European data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018;103(1):F22–F28. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311845.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.