Newborn

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Safety of Full Enteral Feedings Initiated Soon after Birth Instead of Parenteral Fluids in Clinically Stable 30–34 Weeks Gestation Premature Infants

Angela B Hoyos, Pablo Vasquez-Hoyos

Keywords : Central venous lines, Early oral feeds, Hospital-acquired infections, Late premature infants, Newborn, Neonate, Nutrition, Parenteral fluids, Umbilical lines, Z-score

Citation Information : Hoyos AB, Vasquez-Hoyos P. Safety of Full Enteral Feedings Initiated Soon after Birth Instead of Parenteral Fluids in Clinically Stable 30–34 Weeks Gestation Premature Infants. 2024; 3 (3):190-194.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11002-0101

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-09-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Many neonatal intensive care units use feeding protocols where infants born at 30–34 weeks’ gestation are maintained exclusively on parenteral fluids for variable periods without enteral feedings, until there is confirmed hemodynamic stability without any doubt. In addition to the pain and discomfort, intravenous infusions are associated with an increased risk of hospital-acquired infections, which makes it an undesirable practice if not essential. Objective: In this quality improvement (QI) effort, we tested the safety and efficacy of enteral feedings starting within the first 2 hours after birth in infants born at 30–34 weeks’ gestation. Materials and methods: Instead of intravenous fluids, we initiated fluid management in infants born at 30–34 weeks’ gestation using oral/nasogastric milk feedings at 70–80 mL/kg/day divided every 3 hours, with 5 mL increments every 12–24 hours until 200 mL/kg/day was achieved. We compared the utilization of parenteral fluids, the incidence of infection, and growth before and after initiation of this new feeding policy. Results: In our experience, these infants tolerated and utilized enteral feedings well with stable growth and biochemical parameters. They also tolerated daily volume increments in the enteral feedings. We did not find any hypoglycemic events as the first enteral feeding was administered within 2 hours after birth. The enterally fed group showed a similar safety profile with similar weight at discharge and weight Z-scores. We report that infants born as early as 30 weeks gestation can safely tolerate ab initio full enteral feedings. Conclusion: Enteral feedings beginning within 2 hours after birth are a safe and efficacious strategy for fluid management in premature infants born at 30–34 weeks gestation. Routine use of parenteral fluids is not necessary in the initial management of these infants.


PDF Share
  1. Segar JL. A physiological approach to fluid and electrolyte management of the preterm infant: Review. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2020;13(1):11–19. DOI: 10.3233/NPM-190309.
  2. Rutledge A, Murphy HJ, Harer MW, et al. Fluid Balance in the Critically Ill Child Section: “How Bad Is Fluid in Neonates?”. Front Pediatr 2021;9:651458. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.651458.
  3. Selewski DT, Gist KM, Nathan AT, et al. The impact of fluid balance on outcomes in premature neonates: A report from the AWAKEN study group. Pediatr Res 2020;87(3):550–557. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-019-0579-1.
  4. Cho HJ, Cho HK. Central line-associated bloodstream infections in neonates. Korean J Pediatr 2019;62(3):79–84. DOI: 10.3345/kjp.2018.07003.
  5. Sanderson E, Yeo KT, Wang AY, et al. Dwell time and risk of central-line-associated bloodstream infection in neonates. J Hosp Infect 2017;97(3):267–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.06.023.
  6. Balla KC, Rao SP, Arul C, et al. Decreasing central line-associated bloodstream infections through quality improvement initiative. Indian Pediatr 15 2018;55(9):753–756. PMID: 30345978.
  7. Shahid S, Dutta S, Symington A, Shivananda S, McMaster University N. Standardizing umbilical catheter usage in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2014;133(6):e1742–1752. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-1373.
  8. Hoyos AB, Hoyos PV. Decrease in the use of parenteral fluids in premature infants from 31 to 34 weeks of gestation at birth. Preprints.org. 2024. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357310157.
  9. Razzaghy JL, Shukla V, Gunawan E, et al. Early and exclusive enteral nutrition in infants born very preterm: A randomized controlled trial. presented at: PAS 2023; 2023; Washington DC. Available from: https://www.pas-meeting.org/wp-content/uploads/PAS-2023PocketGuide-GeneralInfo-Final.pdf.
  10. Nangia S, Vadivel V, Thukral A, et al. Early total enteral feeding versus conventional enteral feeding in stable very-low-birth-weight infants: A randomised controlled trial. Neonatology 2019;115(3):256–262. DOI: 10.1159/000496015.
  11. Abiramalatha T, Thomas N, Thanigainathan S. High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9 2021;3(3):CD012413. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012413.pub3.
  12. Thomas N, Cherian A, Santhanam S, et al. A randomized control trial comparing two enteral feeding volumes in very low birth weight babies. J Trop Pediatr 2012;58(1):55–58. DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmr011.
  13. Kuschel CA, Evans N, Askie L, et al. A randomized trial of enteral feeding volumes in infants born before 30 weeks’ gestation. J Paediatr Child Health 2000;36(6):581–586. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00577.x.
  14. Sung JH, Choi SJ, Oh SY, et al. Should the diagnostic criteria for suspected clinical chorioamnionitis be changed? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021;34(5):824–833. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1618822.
  15. Sharma D, Shastri S, Sharma P. Intrauterine growth restriction: Antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clin Med Insights Pediatr 2016;10:67–83. DOI: 10.4137/CMPed.S40070.
  16. Briggs-Steinberg C, Roth P. Early-onset sepsis in newborns. Pediatr Rev 2023;44(1):14–22. DOI: 10.1542/pir.2020-001164.
  17. Cordova EG, Belfort MB. Updates on assessment and monitoring of the postnatal growth of preterm infants. Neoreviews 2020;21(2): e98–e108. DOI: 10.1542/neo.21-2-e98.
  18. Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. Restor Dent Endod 2017;42(2):152–155. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152.
  19. Rosner B, Glynn RJ, Lee ML. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data. Biometrics 2006;62(1):185–192. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00389.x.
  20. Vrbin CM. Parametric or nonparametric statistical tests: Considerations when choosing the most appropriate option for your data. Cytopathology 2022;33(6):663–667. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13174.
  21. Nahm FS. Nonparametric statistical tests for the continuous data: The basic concept and the practical use. Korean J Anesthesiol 2016;69(1):8–14. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.1.8.
  22. Kwak S. Are only p-values less than 0.05 significant? A p-value greater than 0.05 is also significant! J Lipid Atheroscler 2023;12(2):89–95. DOI: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.2.89.
  23. Leaf A, Dorling J, Kempley S, et al. Early or delayed enteral feeding for preterm growth-restricted infants: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 2012;129(5):e1260–1268. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-2379.
  24. Tewari VV, Dubey SK, Kumar R, Vardhan S, Sreedhar CM, Gupta G. Early versus late enteral feeding in preterm intrauterine growth restricted neonates with antenatal doppler abnormalities: An open-label randomized trial. J Trop Pediatr 2018;64(1):4–14. DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmx018.
  25. Wang YW, Hung HY, Lin CH, et al. Effect of a delayed start to oral feeding on feeding performance and physiological responses in preterm infants: A randomized clinical trial. J Nurs Res 2018;26(5): 324–331. DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000243.
  26. McClure RJ. Trophic feeding of the preterm infant. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2001;90(436):19–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001. tb01623.x.
  27. Mishra S, Agarwal R, Jeevasankar M, et al. Minimal enteral nutrition. Indian J Pediatr 2008;75(3):267–269. DOI: 10.1007/s12098-008-0057-y.
  28. Morgan J, Bombell S, McGuire W. Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(3):CD000504. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000504.pub4.
  29. Gephart SM, Weller M. Colostrum as oral immune therapy to promote neonatal health. Adv Neonatal Care 2014;14(1):44–51. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000052.
  30. Du Y, Qiu Q, Cheng J, et al. Comparative study on the microbiota of colostrum and nipple skin from lactating mothers separated from their newborn at birth in China. Front Microbiol 2022;13:932495. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.932495.
  31. Sweet L. Expressed breast milk as ‘connection’ and its influence on the construction of ‘motherhood’ for mothers of preterm infants: A qualitative study. Int Breastfeed J 2008;3:30. DOI: 10.1186/1746- 4358-3-30.
  32. Levene I, Adams E. The Interaction of early exclusive mother's milk feeding and ethnic background with ultimate feeding outcomes after very preterm birth. Breastfeed Med 2023;18(11):842–848. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2023.0150.
  33. Maheshwari A, Patel RM, Christensen RD. Anemia, red blood cell transfusions, and necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2018;27(1):47–51. DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.009.
  34. Maheshwari A. Immunologic and hematological abnormalities in necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol. Sep 2015;42(3):567–585. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2015.04.014.
  35. Khashu M, Dame C, Lavoie PM, et al. Current understanding of transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis: Review of clinical and experimental studies and a call for more definitive evidence. Newborn (Clarksville) 2022;1(1):201–208. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11002-0005.
  36. MohanKumar K, Namachivayam K, Song T, et al. A murine neonatal model of necrotizing enterocolitis caused by anemia and red blood cell transfusions. Nat Commun 2019;10(1):3494. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11199-5.
  37. Gephart SM, Gordon PV, Penn AH, et al. Changing the paradigm of defining, detecting, and diagnosing NEC: Perspectives on Bell's stages and biomarkers for NEC. Semin Pediatr Surg 2018;27(1):3–10. DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.002.
  38. Seres DS, Valcarcel M, Guillaume A. Advantages of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2013;6(2): 157–167. DOI: 10.1177/1756283X12467564.
  39. Boscarino G, Conti MG, Di Chiara M, et al. Early enteral feeding improves tolerance of parenteral nutrition in preterm newborns. Nutrients 2021;13(11):3886. DOI: 10.3390/nu13113886.
  40. Thoene M, Anderson-Berry A. Early Enteral Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Narrative review of the nutritional, metabolic, and developmental benefits. Nutrients 2021;13(7):2289. DOI: 10.3390/nu13072289.
  41. Henkel RD, Barnes-Davis ME, Fu TT, et al. Effects of early enteral vs. parenteral protein intake on growth and brain structural volumes in very low birth weight preterm infants. presented at: PAS 2023; 2023; Washington DC. Available from: https://www.pas-meeting.org/wp-content/uploads/PAS-2023PocketGuide-GeneralInfo- Final.pdf.
  42. Greene Z, O'Donnell CP, Walshe M. Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20 2023;6(6):CD009720. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009720.pub3.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.