REVIEW ARTICLE


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-11002-0066
Newborn
Volume 2 | Issue 2 | Year 2023

Neurological Manifestations of Perinatal Dengue


Srijan Singh1, Jubara Alallah2, Astha Amrit3, Akhil Maheshwari4, Suresh Boppana5

1Department of Pediatrics, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

2Department of Pediatrics, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

3Department of Neonatology, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

4Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal Medicine, Louisiana State University – Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana; Global Newborn Society, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America

5Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America

Corresponding Author: Srijan Singh, Department of Pediatrics, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, Phone: +91 7011033174, e-mail: srijanstar89@gmail.com

How to cite this article: Singh S, Alallah J, Amrit A, et al. Neurological Manifestations of Perinatal Dengue. Newborn 2023;2(2):158–172.

Source of support: R01AI109001 to Suresh Boppana.

Conflict of interest: Dr Akhil Maheshwari is associated as Editor-in-Chief of this journal and this manuscript was subjected to this journal’s standard review procedures, with this peer review handled independently of the Editor-in-Chief and his research group.

Received on: 07 June 2023; Accepted on: 30 June 2023; Published on: 30 June 2023

ABSTRACT

Dengue viruses (DENVs) are single-stranded RNA viruses belonging to the family Flaviviridae. There are four distinct antigenically related serotypes, DENVs types 1, 2, 3, and 4. These are all mosquito-borne human pathogens. Congenital dengue disease occurs when there is mother-to-fetus transmission of the virus and should be suspected in endemic regions in neonates presenting with fever, maculopapular rash, and thrombocytopenia. Although most of the infected infants remain asymptomatic, some can develop clinical manifestations such as sepsis-like illness, gastric bleeding, circulatory failure, and death. Neurological manifestations include intracerebral hemorrhages, neurological malformations, and acute focal/disseminated encephalitis/encephalomyelitis. Dengue NS1Ag, a highly conserved glycoprotein, can help the detection of cases in the viremic stage. We do not have proven specific therapies yet; management is largely supportive and is focused on close monitoring and maintaining adequate intravascular volume.

Keywords: Antibody-dependent enhancement, Congenital dengue, Dengue encephalitis, IgM:IgG ratio, Neonate, Neurotropism, NS1Ag, CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia), TAK-003, Vertical transmission.

HIGHLIGHTS

INTRODUCTION

Dengue viruses (DENVs) are members of the family Flaviviridae belonging to the genus Flavivirus.1,2 There are 4 distinct antigenically related DENVs, types 1, 2, 3, and 4,3 and all are mosquito-borne human pathogens.4 The first case of a pregnant woman with dengue fever was reported in 1948.5,6

VIRAL STRUCTURE

Dengue viruses are small spherical viral structures that are typically about 50 nm in diameter and contain a single-stranded RNA genome of positive polarity7 (Fig. 1). The spherical capsid (shell) is surrounded by an envelope containing numerous copies of M and E proteins.8 During infections, the DENV envelope E-glycoprotein binds viral receptors such as heparan sulfate or lectins in cell surface proteins such as DC-SIGN [Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular adhesion molecule-3-Grabbing Non-integrin, also known as CD209 (Cluster of Differentiation 209)] and the C-type LEctin domain-Containing 5A (CLEC5A).914 Once the viral and cell membranes fuse in acidified endocytic vesicles, the viral RNA enters the cytoplasm and gets translated into a single polyprotein, which is then cleaved to yield 3 structural (capsid, precursor membrane, and envelope) and 7 non-structural proteins (NS1, N2A, N2B, N3, N4A, N4B, and N5).7 The non-structural proteins play a role in viral replication and modulation of the cell antiviral response.15 NS3 encodes a viral protease which helps in the cleavage of viral proteins.16 NS5 is an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which aids in assembling the replication complex and transcribes the RNA to negative-strand RNA.17 This strand serves as a template for genomic RNA.18

Figs 1A and B: Schematic diagrams showing (A) surface and side dissection and (B) cross-section of the dengue virus

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Dengue virus infection is spread by two Aedes (Ae.) mosquito species, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. The DENVs are transmitted in a human-mosquito-human cycle.6 The incubation period in the mosquito vectors is 8–12 days, after which the virus can be transmitted to humans.19 In humans, viremia begins after a 4–6-day incubation period and lasts until fever abates.6,20

Both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical areas.21 Ae. albopictus species are more tolerant of cold and have a wider geographic distribution than Ae. aegypti.22,23 Ae. aegypti is the most prevalent species in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.24 A seroprevalence study among children living in India conducted between January 2011 and October 2012 noted 60–80% seropositivity rates.25,26 The geographical prevalence of these mosquitoes and viruses is depicted in Figure 2.2733

Fig. 2: Global distribution of dengue (regions highlighted with purple color). The disease is frequently seen in Southeast Asia, the Northeastern corner of Australia, sub-Saharan Africa, Eastern Mediterranean regions, Southern Europe, the Middle East, Western Pacific Islands, Mexico, the Southern United States, the Caribbean, and all South American countries except Chile

Patterns of Transmission

The DENV transmission follows the following two general patterns, with different implications for disease risk:

  • “Epidemic dengue” occurs when a single DENV strain is introduced into a region as an isolated event with a large population of susceptible mosquitoes and human hosts.34 It can lead to infections among 25–50% of susceptible individuals.35

  • “Hyperendemic dengue” occurs in areas with a year-round presence of vector mosquitoes, continuous circulation of multiple DENV types, and a large population of susceptible individuals. It leads to repeated epidemics.36 Children are more susceptible than adults to dengue in hyperendemic regions. Dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is also seen in hyperendemic regions.37

Factors influencing Transmission

There has been a steady, worldwide increase in DENV infections. The geographic distribution is expanding with population growth and poor urban planning.38 Global climate change also has an impact on disease transmission with higher global temperatures increasing the range of Ae. aegypti and DENVs.39,40 DENV transmission has also increased with El Niño/Southern Oscillation events.41,42

Vertical Transmission

Vertical DENV transmission has been noted in many case series.43 It should be considered when pregnant women acquire the infection early during pregnancy or at least within 10–15 days prior to delivery. In a prospective study, about 2.5% of women showed a positive immunoglobulin M (IgM) serology. Only 1 (1.6%) of the paired umbilical cord samples was seropositive for dengue although none had evidence of viral RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Vertical transmission can increase perinatal morbidity and mortality.44 DENV is transmitted to the fetus during maternal viremia, but these infected mothers may remain asymptomatic.45,46 Pregnancy itself has also not been shown to increase the incidence or severity of dengue.47 Infections in early pregnancy have been noted to cause spontaneous abortions or neural tube alterations in some, but most cases do not show any congenital abnormalities.4850 The mode of delivery does not alter the rate of transmission. Newborns with lower weight may be at higher risk of severe dengue. In a prospective study of 2,958 pregnant females,51 a vertical transmission rate of 18.5–22.7% was reported in a study during an epidemic in French Guiana. Fetal infections seem to be more frequent near term.46 Breastfeeding has also been reported as a mode of vertical transmission during the postnatal period.52

The DENV serotype 2 has been the predominant serotype associated with vertical transmission.53 This may be explained by the high circulation of DENV serotype 2,54 or the ability of this serotype to cross or disrupt the placental barrier. Sequential fetal growth monitoring should be undertaken in pregnant women with dengue to screen for fetal growth restriction and stillbirths.55

COURSE OF INFECTION

The course of infection by the DENVs can be subdivided into early events, dissemination, and the immune response and viral clearance:

Primary vs Secondary Infection

Infection with one of the four serotypes of DENV (primary infection) confers long-lasting specific immunity to viruses of that serotype.50 There might be some, transient immunity to the other serotypes, and subsequent infections can still occur with the other serotype (secondary infection).61 In these secondary infections, the concentration of DENV-specific antibodies increases earlier with higher peak titers and lower IgM:IgG ratio, suggestive of an anamnestic response.62 High levels of DENV-specific antibodies may be seen in later stages of viremia, increasing the formation of immune complexes and activation of complement.63

Neurological Manifestations

Flowchart 1 shows the neurological manifestations. The neurological manifestations of congenital infections may result from (A) direct infection of neurological tissues (encephalitis, meningitis, myositis, myelitis, rhabdomyolysis; (B) systemic or metabolic imbalance (encephalopathy, stroke); and (C) early or late postinfection sequelae (transverse myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis).64

Flowchart 1: Pathogenesis of perinatal dengue infections

Furthermore, DENVs have strong CNS tropism.65 These viruses enter the CNS via the hematogenous route.66,67 These viruses activate endothelial cells (ECs), breach the blood–brain barrier (BBB), infect neurons, and induce cytoarchitectural changes.68 These can reach the brain parenchyma: (A) in infected leukocytes; (B) through axonal transport; (C) via infection of the olfactory bulb epithelium; (D) by disrupting the inter-endothelial tight junctions; and (E) via endothelial infection and basolateral release.69,70 The latter two mechanisms and viruses carried in infected monocytes may be the most critical routes.65 To recapitulate, most DENV strains are neurotropic and neurovirulent, able to evade the immune system and invade the brain efficiently through BBB ECs, leading to replication in the brain parenchyma which induces nervous injury.68,71

An EC cross-activation following infection involves the soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM-1) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecules (sICAM-1).72 The infected endothelium secretes immune mediators; DENV1 is known to induce interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), CCL2, CCL5, and CCL20.73 These molecules have been associated with endothelial hyperpermeability and also with an imbalance in the coagulation pathway leading to microhemorrhages. Many neonates with severe infection can develop disseminated intravascular coagulation.74,75

In the eyes, the virus enters through the hematogenous route and infects the endothelium, pericytes, and other cells.76 Pericytes augment the infection by secreting several immune mediators that modify the barrier physiology. In the CNS, the glia are also infected.7779 Activated astrocytes show altered function, morphology, and biochemical reactions.80 These cells begin to secrete proinflammatory molecules such as IL-6, TNF, and interferon-β.81,82 Strong, continuous stimuli have been associated with astrogliosis and cellular hypertrophy with longer and thicker astrocytic processes;83 overexpression of cytoskeletal proteins such as the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), vimentin, and nestin84 results in glial cell proliferation and scar formation.85

Encephalopathy is a recognized complication of dengue,86,87 and is usually ascribed to the neurotropism of these viruses and consequent invasion of the brain parenchyma (dengue encephalitis). Multisystem involvement from hepatic derangement, cellular fluid leak, hypotension, and altered hemostasis worsens the illness. In a case–control evaluation of the cytokine response in patients with DENV, elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-8 were associated with severe neurological manifestations and poor outcomes.88 In an in vitro study using BV2 microglial cells,89 various DENV serotypes induced different responses. DENV1 induced a cytokine profile that altered vascular permeability, whereas DENV2 altered the oxidative stress-mediated apoptotic response.90 Also, DENV3 established a distinct response with anti-inflammatory and antiviral mediators. DENV4 altered the BBB by inducing matrix metalloproteins.89

Clinical Presentations

Congenital dengue occurs when there is insufficient time for the induction/transplacental passage of protective antibodies postmaternal infection.91 It should be suspected in neonates presenting with fever, maculopapular rash, and thrombocytopenia in endemic regions (Figs 3A and B). Both the mother and baby should be simultaneously evaluated by tests for DENV antigens and serology.91

Figs 3A to D: Clinical manifestations of congenital dengue in neonates. (A and B) Images of infants showing maculopapular rash; (C and D) Images of infants showing microcephaly due to congenital dengue

Maternal DENV infections have been shown to increase the incidence of prematurity.44,57,92 This association can be explained by inflammatory changes triggered by maternal infection, which stimulate uterine contractions (Flowchart 2). There is increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, –8, and TNF, which stimulate the uterus, leading to preterm labor.5,6,20,93 There is conflicting evidence regarding the correlation between the severity of neonatal and maternal dengue, factors affecting vertical transmission, and disease onset.5,57,94 The longer the time from the onset of maternal fever to giving birth, the sooner the occurrence of fever in the neonate with an incubation period of 5–6 days.95 Petechiae in neonatal dengue are seen more frequently as compared to older infants and children.96 Hemoconcentration is not a reliable parameter in neonatal dengue because of an increased red blood cell mass with a higher hematocrit compared to older children and adults.97,98 Investigations such as chest X-ray, renal and liver function tests, and ultrasonography of the chest and abdomen may be done as clinically indicated.99

Flowchart 2: Pathogenesis of neurological manifestations of DENV infections

Mild-moderate maternal DENV infections have not been clearly associated with intra-uterine growth restriction/low birth weight.5 However, in severely afflicted cases, hypovolemia resulting from plasma leakage and hemorrhages could result in uteroplacental insufficiency leading to fetal growth restriction and even demise.100 In a study of 44 pregnancies from India,55 there were miscarriages in 2 (4.5%), stillbirths in 4 (9%), and neonatal deaths in 2 (4.5%). There was preterm delivery in 15 (34.1%) and the infants were born with low birth weight in 13 (29.5%).101,102

Population studies do not show in utero DENV infections as consistently increasing the rates of cesarean sections in infected women or as a cause of congenital anomalies in affected neonates.51,55 In some of these studies, the small number of infants with clearly evident clinical features may have resulted in the lack of statistically significant differences. A small number of infants with early onset in utero infections show neurological manifestations such as microcephaly (Figs 3C and D), anencephaly, and hydrocephalus.60,103 Most of the infants with later-onset infections that likely occurred during the perinatal period, developed encephalopathy and had an uneventful recovery.

Peripartum maternal dengue makes newborns susceptible to complications because most of the transplacentally delivered antibodies lack a protective effect47 and instead, enhance the entry of virus into the host cells.104,105 Postnatal dengue infections are usually asymptomatic, although some infants may manifest with undifferentiated fever, upper respiratory tract symptoms, vomiting, and diarrhea. Liver involvement is more frequent in infants compared to older children.106 The higher frequency of DENV hepatitis can be explained by the tropism of these viruses for liver cells.107 Many studies show that the diagnosis of neonatal dengue requires a high index of suspicion.43,44,46,108 Infants with cutaneous manifestations and/or fever frequently show hepatomegaly.98 It is seen more frequently in epidemic-region countries where pregnant women could get infected near the time of delivery.5,44,93

Neonatal dengue can be a difficult diagnosis.109,21 In one study, 12 out of 32 cases were classified as neonatal sepsis or neonatal immune thrombocytopenia.110 Neonates who are diagnosed with dengue should be monitored for warning signs of shock or severe hemorrhages. The hemorrhagic manifestations are usually mild and are usually limited to petechiae.110 Total leukocyte counts can drop during the febrile phase but then normalizes in the critical phase.110 Some infants may show gall bladder wall thickening.20,26,49,111113 Monitoring for complications should continue for 24–48 hours after defervescence.

Pregnant women should avoid travel to Aedes spp. endemic regions. Post-travel laboratory testing should be reserved for symptomatic patients.114

Laboratory Diagnosis

The diagnosis of congenital DENV infections is based on the history of maternal fever and the presence of either dengue nonstructural 1 (NS1) antigen or dengue antibodies.

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay-based NS1 Antigen Tests

Dengue NS1Ag is a highly conserved glycoprotein, which is produced in both membrane associated and secreted forms and is abundant in the serum of patients during the early stage of dengue infection. It helps in the detection of cases early in the viremic stage.5,57,94 Other diagnostic options are dengue virus isolation or detection of antibodies.

Serologic Assay for DENV

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

It is a simple test based on detecting the dengue-specific IgM antibodies in the test serum by capturing them using antihuman IgM bound to the solid phase.115 After adding dengue antigen, if anti-dengue IgM is present, it will bind and give a color reaction with the enzyme substrate. Antidengue IgM is detectable by day 5 of the illness.116 For single serum, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) IgM titer more than or equal to 1 or an IgG titer above 3 is considered evidence of acute and/or recent DENV infection. An ELISA IgM:IgG ratio of above 1.8:1 is considered a primary infection. Acute DENV infections are typically associated with a 4-fold or higher rise in antibody titers.117

Hemagglutination (HI)

Seroconversion or high titers (≥1:2560) are suggestive of recent infection. Moreover, WHO recommended using HI titers of convalescent sera as the criteria to distinguish between primary and secondary infection. The infection is diagnosed as primary if the titer in a week or more after the onset of illness is above 1:1280 or as secondary if antibody titers are more than or equal to 1:1280.118 Also, HI antibody is used in laboratories and is believed to assess seroprotection; Ig-G ELISA compares well to the HI test.118

Dengue Viral Isolation

Tissue Culture

Serum samples are inoculated into tissue culture flasks containing Ae. albopictus mosquito cell monolayers.119 After 90 minutes of adsorption of the inocula on cells at 28°C, cell cultures are incubated for 7 days at 28°C. Cells are harvested for the identification of viruses by indirect immunofluorescence staining. Virus isolation and nucleic acid tests have high specificity but are expensive and labor intensive and are used for early detection in the first week of illness.120 Virus isolation takes around 7–10 days.

Mosquito Inoculation

Dengue viral isolation has been attempted with laboratory-reared mosquitoes (Toxoshynchites splendors) by an intrathoracic inoculation technique.121 Identification of DENV serotypes is performed by indirect fluorescence antibody staining using serotype-specific monoclonal antibodies.122

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) can be used to detect DENV RNA. Nested RT-PCR, real-time RT-PCR, or nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) can be used.

Pauci-symptomatic dengue cases may be underdiagnosed during the neonatal period because DENV infections during pregnancy are not identified.46

The “diagnosis of vertical transmission” of dengue can be made if a sample of the umbilical cord, placenta, or newborn peripheral blood collected immediately postpartum reveals a positive result in a dengue diagnostic test.46 Umbilical cord blood and placenta should be tested if there is a history of dengue during pregnancy or fever within 15 days before the term in dengue-endemic regions. Positive results indicate a need for close clinical monitoring of the newborn; peripheral blood samples should be tested if the infant becomes symptomatic.

The “diagnosis of neurological manifestations” may require an ultrasound of the skull or a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain.123 The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies are required to diagnose dengue encephalitis. Tests for CSF IgM, IgG, and NS1 antigen should be performed if neurological manifestations are present.124 Carod–Artal et al.125 defined dengue encephalitis if each of the following criteria were fulfilled: (A) Dengue CNS involvement; (B) Presence of dengue virus RNA, IgM, or NS1 antigen in CSF; and (C) CSF pleocytosis without other neuroinvasive pathogens.

Pleocytosis in CSF may not be seen in 5% of encephalitis cases, especially early in the course of dengue.126,127 Furthermore, IgM antibodies in CSF have high specificity but low sensitivity; these appear only by the seventh day following infection.128 Hence, the absence of antibodies does not exclude the neurological manifestations associated with dengue.

In view of these limitations, another definition was suggested for dengue encephalitis: (A) presence of fever; (B) acute signs of cerebral involvement such as altered consciousness or seizures and/or focal neurological signs; (C) reactive IgM dengue antibody, NS1 antigen, or positive dengue PCR on serum and/or CSF; (D) exclusion of other causes of viral encephalitis and encephalopathy.129 This definition will reduce the number of missed cases of dengue encephalitis. Brain-evoked response auditory (BERA), visual-evoked potential (VEP), and follow-up MRI should be considered. These infants need follow-up for neurocognitive outcomes.130

Congenital DENV infections can show notable CNS lesions on imaging (Fig. 4). However, many of these findings are not characteristic of in utero infections and can also be seen in infants who acquire the virus after birth. In a retrospective study of 36 patients with serologically proven DENV infections with neurological symptoms,131 The MRI did not show any abnormalities in 11, showed an encephalitic pattern in 12, encephalopathic (seizure related/metabolic) findings in 4, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) in 3, and isolated micro- or macro-hemorrhages in 6. Such a pattern-recognition approach may help in identifying the pathology, differential diagnosis, and in making treatment decisions. In another study,132 the basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, cerebellum, cortical white matter, periventricular white matter, and cortical gray matter were most frequently involved and appeared hyperintense on T2-weighted images, and the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) protocol. These lesions appeared iso- or hypo-intense on T1-weighted images. “Blooming” micro-hemorrhages were seen on susceptibility-weighted MRI (Figs 5 and 6). Children who are infected or manifest at later ages typically show less severe imaging changes (Fig. 7).

Figs 4A to C: Antenatal scan of a mother at 29 weeks, 3 days gestation. (A) Enlarged extra-axial CSF spaces with ventricular dilatation (white arrow) and cystic changes (blue arrow); (B) Thinning of parenchyma (red arrow); and (C) Ventricular dilatation (red arrow)

Figs 5A to D: Fetal MRI at 29 weeks, 6 days. (A) Enlarged extra-axial CSF spaces with ventricular dilatation (white arrow); (B) Cystic changes of the bilateral frontal lobes and left parietal area (blue arrow); (C) and (D) Images showing thinning of the parenchyma (red arrows), which resulted in the loss of volume and architecture of the cerebral parenchyma

Figs 6A and B: Postnatal MRI on day 8 after birth (A) T1W image; (B) T2W image. Findings show decreased brain parenchymal thickness, especially in the supratentorial lobes with marked simplification of gyral patterns (white arrows), loss of normal fissurization, and operculation. Other findings include ventriculomegaly (blue arrows), cystic changes (red arrows), and altered formation of the cerebral cortex with thinning of the corpus callosum (yellow arrows). Additional features are enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces (green arrows), bilateral open sylvian fissures and cerebellar hypoplasia (purple arrows)

Figs 7A and B: The MRI brain (T2-weighted, two levels) of a 2-year-old child with dengue encephalitis showing periventricular hyperintensities along bilateral lateral ventricles (white arrows). The changes are most prominent along the posterior horns

Clinical Management

Treatment

No credible anti-DENV therapy is currently available.133 Management is supportive with close monitoring and is focused on maintaining adequate intravascular volumes (Flowchart 3). In mild cases, oral rehydration by breastfeeds or formula feeds is sufficient. Acetaminophen (maximum 60 mg/kg/day) can be used for the management of fever. Aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents should be avoided because of the risk of bleeding complications and potentially of Reye’s syndrome in infants.

Flowchart 3: Management of perinatal dengue infections

Plasma leakage should be managed with intravascular volume repletion to prevent hypovolemic shock. Infants with established intravascular volume depletion may require intravenous fluids. Blood transfusions may be needed in patients with significant bleeding and anemia, and inadequate response to fluid resuscitation.134136 Acidosis, hypoglycemia, and hypocalcemia should be investigated and corrected as needed. Prophylactic platelet transfusion is not recommended.137 Fresh frozen plasma may be used in cases with coagulopathy with bleeding.

Breastfeeding

The secretion of DENV in human milk is uncertain and likely very rare, even though there are some positive reports.52 Breastfeeding is encouraged in infants of infected mothers.138 Human milk contains antiviral antibodies that may provide protection.139 Neonates may be discharged once afebrile for 24–48 hours, hemodynamically stable with good urine output, and accepting feeds well.

There is no role for corticosteroids,140142 intravenous immunoglobulins, pentoxifylline, or activated factor VII.143145 Direct viral inhibitors and modifiers of virus-host interactions are under investigation.146,147 Chloroquine, lovastatin, balapiravir (a polymerase inhibitor), and celgosivir (an α-glucosidase inhibitor) have not been shown to have any benefit in randomized controlled trials.148150

Outcomes

The DENV infections during pregnancy can increase the overall risk of neurologic anomalies by 50% and of congenital malformations of the brain by 4-fold.102 The biological mechanism(s) for this teratogenicity are unclear, but there is evidence for the DENV virus crossing the placental and blood–brain barriers102,151,152 and for its neurotropism.125,153 The DENV antigen and antibody testing in CSF has procedural inconsistencies, limited availability, and variable sensitivity and specificity.154 An MRI of the brain may reveal hyperintensities in globus pallidus known as the “double doughnut sign”.155 Dengue encephalitis should be considered as a possibility in an infant with dengue fever with altered sensorium.

Unlike fetal dengue, the outcomes of postnatal infections seem more encouraging but still need further study. One study from Thailand showed normal growth and development in all infants with neonatal dengue at 1-year follow-up.53 Some neonates can recover even from ADEM following vertically transmitted infections. The mothers had a history of febrile illness before delivery; the infants developed fever, lethargy, poor feeding, and seizures that lasted for up to a week. The MRI scans showed multiple areas of restricted diffusion of the white matter in the frontoparietal and temporal lobes and internal capsules. However, even though the severity of ADEM can vary between patients, many recover over time probably because the immune response differs from that in adults and does not augment tissue damage.4,151 In one case reported from India, the neonate fulfilled all criteria for dengue encephalitis; there was fever, lethargy, and seizures, positive serology for NS1 antigen, and detectable titers of DENV IgM antibody in serum and CSF. Management includes supportive measures and phenobarbitone.156 There was gradual recovery without any sequelae.

In neonatal and adult murine models infected by intranasal inoculation, DENV serotype 2 showed brain tropism with encephalitis.157 After invading the upper respiratory tract mucosa, it likely entered the brain through the olfactory nerve with massive viral replication. There were neurological symptoms.69 Affected areas showed considerable leukocyte recruitment, but paradoxically, these cells may have increased the severity of encephalitis owing to the Trojan horse effect.158,159

Prevention

Approaches for the prevention of DENV infection in endemic areas may include vaccination, mosquito control, and personal protective measures.160

Vaccine Development

Infection with one DENV type provides long-term protection against reinfection with that same type and a short-lived cross-protection against the other DENV types.161

The vaccine CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia) has been licensed in many countries in Latin America and Southeast Asia. It is a formulation of four chimeric yellow fever 17D-dengue vaccine viruses.162,163 The vaccine shows 75% efficacy against DENV-3 and DENV-4, 50% for DENV-1 and 35–42% for DENV-2. According to the WHO, the vaccine is protective against severe dengue for individuals with dengue seropositivity at the time of first vaccination. Vaccine efficacy is lower (34–36%) in children 2–5 years of age and in children who do not have detectable dengue-neutralizing antibodies prior to vaccination.164166 Two vaccines are in clinical development, the TAK-003 and a tetravalent, live-virus vaccine attenuated by directed mutagenesis with a DENV-2/-4chimeric strain.109,111,112 TAK-003 is tetravalent vaccine based on an attenuated laboratory-derived DENV-2 virus.167170 Further studies are required to evaluate efficacy and safety, especially for DENV-3 and DENV-4.

Mosquito Control

The methods that are most efficacious involve reducing breeding sites and larva control. Seeding water vessels with copepods (these are small crustaceans found in most freshwater and saltwater habitats) that feed on mosquito larvae can eliminate Ae. aegypti and dengue transmission. Endosymbiotic control can be achieved by releasing mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia, an obligate intracellular bacterium, which lowers the susceptibility to infection by DENVs.171174

Protective Measures against Mosquito Bites

This include careful use of insect repellents, wearing long-sleeved shirts and long pants, and control of mosquitoes inside and outside the home. Repellents containing DEET (name derived from DET in N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide) are generally considered safe if used in only necessary amounts. These should not be applied on the face and around the eyes.

Detailed information for some of the viral components is listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Major structural components of DENVs
Structure Available information
Lipid envelope The nucleocapsid is surrounded by a lipoprotein envelope derived from the nuclear membrane of the infected host cell.7
Glycoproteins Projecting from the lipid envelope are viral glycoprotein spikes that bind specific host receptors to facilitate virus entry. DENV binds to cells by the major viral envelope (E) glycoprotein, which is critical for infectivity.9–11
Receptor binding motifs Receptor binding motifs are involved in virion attachment to cell surface receptors. DENV infection begins with virus attachment to the target cell by the interaction between viral surface proteins and receptors on the cell surface leading to the internalization of the virus by receptor-mediated endocytosis.174–176
Envelope protein The nucleocapsid is surrounded by a trilaminar lipoprotein envelope containing envelope protein or the “E” glycoprotein.9–11,177
Membrane protein The virus particles have two surface viral proteins: the E (envelope) glycoprotein, which is the major determining antigen and involved in binding and fusion during viral entry, and the M (membrane) protein, a part of the precursor prM, formed during the maturation of the virus. M acts as a secretory protein analogous to the major envelope protein E.178
MHC or HLA proteins Some MHC gene combinations can act synergistically to influence disease expression in previously DENV-exposed individuals.179
Spike protein Projecting from the lipid envelope are viral glycoprotein spikes that bind specific host receptors to facilitate virus entry.178
Surface tubules Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Palisade layer Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Viral tegument Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Lateral bodies Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Capsid The mature capsid of DENV is a highly basic protein of 12 kDa that forms homodimers in solution and has an affinity for nucleic acids and lipid membranes. It exists as a 100-residue monomer and contains 26 basic amino acids and only 3 acidic residues.8
Capsomeres The proteins that compose the structural unit may form three-dimensional structures known as “capsomeres” that are visible in an electron micrograph.8
Core membrane Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease.
Protein core The polyprotein produced by dengue virion is processed into three mature structural proteins (C, prM, and E) and seven nonstructural proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5).180
Core fibrils DEN2 virus-infected apoptotic cells also show bundles of intracellular microfibrils which resemble the contractile structures observed in fibroblasts and some glomerular cells. These structures could be related to the apoptotic process, since, filamentous material, clumping of tonofilaments and MyD88 protein.181
Matrix Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Enzymes The only known enzymes of DENV are encoded by NS3 and NS5 proteins. The N-terminal domain of NS3 is a protease (with NS2B as a cofactor) and the C-terminal domain is an RNA helicase. NS5 contains a methyltransferase (MTase) at the N terminus and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) at the C terminus.148
RNA elements NS5 polymerase domain helps to synthesize a transient double-stranded replicative RNA intermediate which is composed of viral plus- and minus-strand RNAs. The newly synthesized minus strand serves in turn as a template, allowing the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase to synthesize additional plus-strand genomic RNA.182–186
Nucleus Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Nucleosome Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
DNA No DNA genome exists
RNA The dengue virion contains a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome of approximately 11 kb which is translated into a large polyprotein during the infectious life cycle.7,180
Genome-associated polyprotein RNA genome of dengue virus is translated into a large polyprotein which in turn is processed by cellular and viral proteases into three mature structural proteins (C, prM, and E) and seven nonstructural proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5).180
DNA polymerase Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
RNA polymerase The C-terminal region of NS5 has five amino acid sequence motifs which form the signature of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRps). Viral replication begins with the synthesis of minus-strand RNA from the positive-strand RNA genome, which then acts as a template for the formation of plus-strand RNA genomes. Production of new viral particles is catalyzed by the NS5 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.182
Reverse transcriptase Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Head Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Base plate Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Integrase Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Tail Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Tail fiber Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease
Neck Either not expressed or relevance unclear fetal/infantile disease

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future efforts should be directed toward the development of antiviral agents for the management of dengue. In addition, there should be an emphasis on planned urbanization with the escalation of efforts toward mosquito control and vaccine development.

REFERENCES

1. Henchal EA, Putnak JR. The dengue viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev 1990;3(4):376–396. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.3.4.376.

2. Wilder–Smith A, Schwartz E. Dengue in travelers. N Engl J Med 2005;353(9):924–932. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMRA041927.

3. Andrade EHP, Figueiredo LB, Vilela APP, et al. Spatial–temporal co-circulation of dengue virus 1, 2, 3, and 4 associated with coinfection cases in a hyperendemic area of Brazil: A 4-week survey. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016;94(5):1080. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.15-0892.

4. Martina BEE, Koraka P, Osterhaus ADME. Dengue virus pathogenesis: An integrated view. Clin Microbiol Rev 2009;22(4):564–581. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00035-09.

5. Paixão ES, Teixeira MG, Costa M da CN, et al. Dengue during pregnancy and adverse fetal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16(7):857–865. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00088-8.

6. Ribeiro CF, Lopes VGS, Brasil P, et al. Dengue infection in pregnancy and its impact on the placenta. Int J Infect Dis 2017;55:109–112. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJID.2017.01.002.

7. Lok SM. The interplay of dengue virus morphological diversity and human antibodies. Trends Microbiol 2016;24(4):284–293. DOI: 10.1016/J.TIM.2015.12.004.

8. Byk LA, Gamarnik AV. Properties and functions of the dengue virus capsid protein. Annu Rev Virol 2016;3(1):263–281. DOI: 10.1146/ANNUREV-VIROLOGY-110615-042334.

9. Modis Y, Ogata S, Clements D, et al. A ligand-binding pocket in the dengue virus envelope glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100(12):6986–6991. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.0832193100.

10. Modis Y, Ogata S, Clements D, et al. Structure of the dengue virus envelope protein after membrane fusion. Nature 2004; 427(6972):313–319.DOI: 10.1038/NATURE02165.

11. Mukhopadhyay S, Kuhn RJ, Rossmann MG. A structural perspective of the flavivirus life cycle. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005;3(1):13–22. DOI: 10.1038/NRMICRO1067.

12. Chen Y, Maguire T, Hileman RE, et al. Dengue virus infectivity depends on envelope protein binding to target cell heparan sulfate. Nat Med 1997;3(8):866–871. DOI: 10.1038/NM0897-866.

13. Tassaneetrithep B, Burgess TH, Granelli–Piperno A, et al. DC-SIGN (CD209) mediates dengue virus infection of human dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2003;197(7):823–829. DOI: 10.1084/JEM.20021840.

14. Chen ST, Lin YL, Huang MT, et al. CLEC5A is critical for dengue-virus-induced lethal disease. Nature.2008;453(7195):672–676. DOI: 10.1038/NATURE07013.

15. Wang A, Thurmond S, Islas L, et al. Zika virus genome biology and molecular pathogenesis. Emerg Microbes Infect 2017;6(3):e13. DOI: 10.1038/EMI.2016.141.

16. Lin KH, Ali A, Rusere L, et al. Dengue virus NS2B/NS3 protease inhibitors exploiting the prime side. J Virol 2017;91(10). DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00045-17.

17. Nascimento IJ dos S, Santos–Júnior PF da S, de Aquino TM, et al. Insights on dengue and Zika NS5 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 2021;224:113698. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJMECH.2021.113698.

18. Murugesan A, Manoharan M. Dengue virus. Emerging Reemerging Viral Pathogens 2020:1(16):281–359. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819400-3.00016-8.

19. Chan M, Johansson MA. The incubation periods of dengue viruses. PLoS One 2012;7(11):50972. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0050972.

20. Machado CR, Machado ES, Denis Rohloff R, et al. Is pregnancy associated with severe dengue? A review of data from the Rio de Janeiro surveillance information system. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7(5):e2217. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0002217.

21. Caron M, Paupy C, Grard G, et al. Recent introduction and rapid dissemination of chikungunya virus and Dengue virus serotype 2 associated with human and mosquito coinfections in Gabon, central Africa. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55(6). DOI: 10.1093/CID/CIS530.

22. Gratz NG. Critical review of the vector status of Aedes albopictus. Med Vet Entomol 2004;18(3):215–227. DOI: 10.1111/J.0269-283X.2004.00513.X.

23. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Update: Aedes albopictus infestation – United States, Mexico. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1989;38(25):440, 445–446. PMID: 2499758.

24. Li HH, He ZJ, Xie LM, et al. A challenge for a unique dengue vector control programme: Assessment of the spatial variation of insecticide resistance status amongst Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus populations in Gampaha District, Sri Lanka. Biomed Res Int 2021;2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6619175.

25. World Health Organization. Dengue Bulletin, Vol. 41. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/ISSN-0250-8362. Accessed on: 15 December 2022.

26. Garg S, Chakravarti A, Singh R, et al. Dengue serotype-specific seroprevalence among 5- to 10-year-old children in India: A community-based cross-sectional study. Int J Infect Dis 2017;54:25–30. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJID.2016.10.030.

27. Wartel TA, Prayitno A, Hadinegoro SRS, et al. Three decades of dengue surveillance in five highly endemic South East Asian countries. Asia Pac J Public Health 2017;29(1):7–16. DOI: 10.1177/1010539516675701.

28. Mackenzie JS, Broom AK, Hall RA, et al. Arboviruses in the Australian region, 1990 to 1998. Commun Dis Intell 1998;22(6):93–100. PMID: 9648365.

29. Amarasinghe A, Kuritsky JN, Letson GW, et al. Dengue virus infection in Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17(8):1349–1354. DOI: 10.3201/EID1708.101515.

30. Messina JP, Brady OJ, Pigott DM, et al. A global compendium of human dengue virus occurrence. Sci Data 2014;1:140004. DOI: 10.1038/SDATA.2014.4.

31. Humphrey JM, Cleton NB, Reusken CBEM, et al. Dengue in the Middle East and North Africa: A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016;10(12):e0005194. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0005194.

32. Sharp TM, Morris S, Morrison A, et al. Fatal dengue acquired in Florida. N Engl J Med 2021;384(23):2257–2259. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMC2023298.

33. Schaffner F, Medlock JM, van Bortel W. Public health significance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19(8):685–692.DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12189.

34. Mondal N. The resurgence of dengue epidemic and climate change in India. Lancet 2023;401(10378):727–728. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00226-X.

35. McBride WJH, Mullner H, Labrooy JT, et al. The 1993 dengue 2 epidemic in North Queensland: A serosurvey and comparison of hemagglutination inhibition with an ELISA. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998;59(3):457–461. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.1998.59.457.

36. Endy TP, Nisalak A, Chunsuttiwat S, et al. Spatial and temporal circulation of dengue virus serotypes: A prospective study of primary school children in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156(1):52–59. DOI: 10.1093/AJE/KWF006.

37. Tantawichien T. Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in adolescents and adults. Paediatr Int Child Health 2012;32(s1):22–27. DOI: 10.1179/2046904712Z.00000000049.

38. Gubler DJ. Epidemic dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever: A global public health problem in the 21st century. Trends Microbiol 2002;10(2):100–103. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-842x(01)02288-0.

39. Hales S, de Wet N, Maindonald J, et al. Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: An empirical model. Lancet 2002;360(9336):830–834. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09964-6.

40. Jetten TH, Focks DA. Potential changes in the distribution of dengue transmission under climate warming. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1997;57(3):285–297. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.1997.57.285.

41. Gubler DJ. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998;11(3):480–496. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.11.3.480.

42. Hales S, Weinstein P, Woodward A. Dengue fever epidemics in the South Pacific: Driven by El Niño Southern Oscillation? Lancet 1996;348(9042):1664–1665. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65737-6.

43. Sirinavin S, Nuntnarumit P, Supapannachart S, et al. Vertical dengue infection: case reports and review. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23(11):1042–1047. DOI: 10.1097/01.INF.0000143644.95692.0E.

44. Pouliot SH, Xiong X, Harville E, et al. Maternal dengue and pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2010; 65(2):107–118.DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181cb8fbc.

45. Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, et al. Dengue: A continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010;8(Suppl. 12):S7–S16. DOI: 10.1038/NRMICRO2460.

46. Basurko C, Matheus S, Hildéral H, et al. Estimating the risk of vertical transmission of dengue: A prospective study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018;98(6):1826–1832. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.16-0794.

47. Carroll ID, Toovey S, Van Gompel A. Dengue fever and pregnancy: A review and comment. Travel Med Infect Dis 2007;5(3):183–188. DOI: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2006.11.002.

48. Fernández R, Rodríguez T, Borbonet F, et al. Study of the relationship dengue-pregnancy in a group of cuban-mothers. Rev Cubana Med Trop 1994;46(2):76–78.

49. Carles G, Peiffer H, Talarmin A. Effects of dengue fever during pregnancy in French Guiana. Clin Infect Dis 1999;28(3):637–640. DOI: 10.1086/515144.

50. Thomas J, Thomas P, George CR. Neonatal dengue. Int J Contemp Pediatrics 2017;4(6):2234–2236. DOI: 10.18203/2349-3291.IJCP20174765.

51. Tan PC, Rajasingam G, Devi S, et al. Dengue infection in pregnancy: Prevalence, vertical transmission, and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(5):1111–1117. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816a49fc.

52. Barthel A, Gourinat AC, Cazorla C, et al. Breast milk as a possible route of vertical transmission of dengue virus? Clin Infect Dis 2013;57(3):415–417. DOI: 10.1093/CID/CIT227.

53. Phongsamart W, Yoksan S, Vanaprapa N, et al. Dengue virus infection in late pregnancy and transmission to the infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008;27(6):500–504. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0B013E318167917A.

54. Nisalak A, Endy TP, Nimmannitya S, et al. Serotype-specific dengue virus circulation and dengue disease in Bangkok, Thailand from 1973 to 1999. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003;68(2):191–202. PMID: 12641411.

55. Brar R, Sikka P, Suri V, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes of dengue fever in pregnancy: a large prospective and descriptive observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021;304(1):91–100. DOI: 10.1007/S00404-020-05930-7.

56. World Health Organization. Dengue and severe dengue. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue. Accessed on: 9 June 2023.

57. Xiong YQ, Mo Y, Shi TL, et al. Dengue virus infection during pregnancy increased the risk of adverse fetal outcomes? An updated meta-analysis. J Clin Virol 2017;94:42–49. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCV.2017.07.008.

58. Katzelnick LC, Montoya M, Gresh L, et al. Neutralizing antibody titers against dengue virus correlate with protection from symptomatic infection in a longitudinal cohort. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113(3):728–733. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.1522136113/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.1522136113.SAPP.PDF.

59. Chao CH, Wu WC, Lai YC, et al. Dengue virus nonstructural protein 1 activates platelets via Toll-like receptor 4, leading to thrombocytopenia and hemorrhage. PLoS Pathog 2019;15(4):e1007625. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1007625.

60. Alallah J, Mohtisham F, Saidi N, et al. Congenital dengue in a Saudi neonate: A case report. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2020;13(2):279–282. DOI: 10.3233/NPM-190286.

61. Xu M, Züst R, Toh YX, et al. Protective capacity of the human anamnestic antibody response during acute dengue virus infection. J Virol 2016;90(24):11122. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01096-16.

62. Changal KH, Raina AH, Raina A, et al. Differentiating secondary from primary dengue using IgG to IgM ratio in early dengue: An observational hospital based clinico–serological study from North India. BMC Infect Dis 2016;16(1):715. DOI: 10.1186/S12879-016-2053-6.

63. Moi ML, Ami Y, Shirai K, et al. Formation of infectious dengue virus–antibody immune complex in vivo in marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) after passive transfer of anti-dengue virus monoclonal antibodies and infection with dengue virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015;92(2):370. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.14-0455.

64. Murthy JMK. Neurological complications of dengue infection. Neurol India 2010;58(4):581–584. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.68654.

65. Begum F, Das S, Mukherjee D, et al. Insight into the tropism of dengue virus in humans. Viruses 2019;11(12):1136. DOI: 10.3390/V11121136.

66. Lanteri MC, Busch MP. Dengue in the context of “safe blood” and global epidemiology: To screen or not to screen? Transfusion (Paris) 2012;52(8):1634–1639. DOI: 10.1111/J.1537-2995.2012.03747.X.

67. Guzman MG, Harris E. Dengue. Lancet 2015;385(9966):453–465. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60572-9.

68. Calderón–Peláez MA, Velandia–Romero ML, Bastidas–Legarda LY, et al. Dengue virus infection of blood–brain barrier cells: Consequences of severe disease. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1435. DOI: 10.3389/FMICB.2019.01435.

69. Miner JJ, Diamond MS. Mechanisms of restriction of viral neuroinvasion at the blood–brain barrier. Curr Opin Immunol 2016;38:18–23. DOI: 10.1016/J.COI.2015.10.008.

70. Tohidpour A, Morgun AV, Boitsova EB, et al. Neuroinflammation and infection: Molecular mechanisms associated with dysfunction of neurovascular unit. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017;7:276. DOI: 10.3389/FCIMB.2017.00276/BIBTEX.

71. Velandia–Romero ML, Acosta–Losada O, Castellanos JE. In vivo infection by a neuroinvasive neurovirulent dengue virus. J Neurovirol 2012;18(5):374–387. DOI: 10.1007/S13365-012-0117-Y.

72. Cardier JE, Rivas B, Romano E, et al. Evidence of vascular damage in dengue disease: Demonstration of high levels of soluble cell adhesion molecules and circulating endothelial cells. Endothelium 2009;13(5):335–340. DOI: 10.1080/10623320600972135.

73. Soe HJ, Khan AM, Manikam R, et al. High dengue virus load differentially modulates human microvascular endothelial barrier function during early infection. J Gen Virol 2017;98(12):2993–3007. DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000981.

74. Srikiatkhachorn A, Kelley JF. Endothelial cells in dengue hemorrhagic fever. Antiviral Res 2014;109(1):160–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.07.005.

75. Roach T, Alcendor DJ. Zika virus infection of cellular components of the blood-retinal barriers: Implications for viral associated congenital ocular disease. J Neuroinflammation 2017;14(1):43. DOI: 10.1186/S12974-017-0824-7.

76. Carr JM, Ashander LM, Calvert JK, et al. Molecular responses of human retinal cells to infection with dengue virus. Mediators Inflamm 2017;2017:3164375. DOI: 10.1155/2017/3164375.

77. Abbott NJ, Rönnbäck L, Hansson E. Astrocyte–endothelial interactions at the blood–brain barrier. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7(1):41–53.DOI: 10.1038/nrn1824.

78. Perea G, Navarrete M, Araque A. Tripartite synapses: Astrocytes process and control synaptic information. Trends Neurosci 2009;32(8):421–431. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.001.

79. Middeldorp J, Hol EM. GFAP in health and disease. Prog Neurobiol 2011;93(3):421–443. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.01.005.

80. White RE, Jakeman LB. Don’t fence me in: Harnessing the beneficial roles of astrocytes for spinal cord repair. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2008;26(2–3):197–214. PMID: 18820411.

81. Boonnak K, Dambach KM, Donofrio GC, et al. Cell type specificity and host genetic polymorphisms influence antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus infection. J Virol 2011;85(4):1671–1683. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00220-10.

82. Burkert K, Moodley K, Angel CE, et al. Detailed analysis of inflammatory and neuromodulatory cytokine secretion from human NT2 astrocytes using multiplex bead array. Neurochem Int 2012;60(6):573–580. DOI: 10.1016/J.NEUINT.2011.09.002.

83. Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS, Lee YL. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: GFAP-thirty-one years (1969–2000). Neurochem Res 2000;25(9–10):1439–1451. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007677003387.

84. Buffo A, Rolando C, Ceruti S. Astrocytes in the damaged brain: Molecular and cellular insights into their reactive response and healing potential. Biochem Pharmacol 2010;79(2):77–89. DOI: 10.1016/J.BCP.2009.09.014.

85. Sofroniew MV. Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation. Trends Neurosci 2009;32(12):638–647. DOI: 10.1016/J.TINS.2009.08.002.

86. Cam BV, Fonsmark L, Hue NB, et al. Prospective case-control study of encephalopathy in children with dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001;65(6):848–851. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.2001.65.848.

87. Hendarto SK, Hadinegoro R. Dengue encephalopathy. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1992;34(3):350–357. DOI: 10.1111/J.1442-200X.1992.TB00971.X.

88. Mehta VK, Verma R, Garg RK, et al. Study of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 levels in patients with neurological manifestations of dengue. J Postgrad Med 2017;63(1):11–15. DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.188545.

89. Bhatt RS, Kothari ST, Gohil DJ, et al. Novel evidence of microglial immune response in impairment of dengue infection of CNS. Immunobiology 2015;220(10):1170–1176. DOI: 10.1016/J.IMBIO.2015.06.002.

90. Olagnier D, Peri S, Steel C, et al. Cellular oxidative stress response controls the antiviral and apoptotic programs in dengue virus-infected dendritic cells. PLoS Pathog 2014;10(12):e1004566. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1004566.

91. Gupta S, Choudhury V, Gupta NP, et al. Congenital dengue in neonate. Clin Case Rep 2020;9(2):704–706. DOI: 10.1002/CCR3.3627.

92. Ribeiro CF, Lopes VGS, Brasil P, et al. Dengue during pregnancy: Association with low birth weight and prematurity. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2016;58(1):1–3. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-9946201658008.

93. Friedman EE, Dallah F, Harville EW, et al. Symptomatic dengue infection during pregnancy and infant outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014;8(10):e3226. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0003226.

94. Huits R, Soentjens P, Maniewski–Kelner U, et al. Clinical utility of the nonstructural 1 antigen rapid diagnostic test in the management of dengue in returning travelers with fever. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4(1):ofw273. DOI: 10.1093/OFID/OFW273.

95. Janjindamai W, Pruekprasert P. Perinatal dengue infection: A case report and review of literature. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2003;34(4):793–796. PMID: 15115089.

96. Chau TNB, Anders KL, Lien LB, et al. Clinical and virological features of dengue in Vietnamese infants. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010;4(4):e657. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0000657.

97. Jain A, Chaturvedi UC. Dengue in infants: An overview. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010;59(2):119–130. DOI: 10.1111/J.1574-695X.2010.00670.X.

98. Hammond SN, Balmaseda A, Pérez L, et al. Differences in dengue severity in infants, children, and adults in a 3-year hospital-based study in Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005;73(6):1063–1070.

99. Dewan N, Zuluaga D, Osorio L, et al. Ultrasound in dengue: A scoping review. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2021;104(3):826–835. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.20-0103.

100. Agrawal P, Garg R, Srivastava S, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with dengue infection in Northern India. Ind J Clin Pract 2014;24(11):1053–1055. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200576.

101. Srikiatkhachorn A, Mathew A, Rothman AL. Immune-mediated cytokine storm and its role in severe dengue. Semin Immunopathol 2017;39(5):563–574. DOI: 10.1007/S00281-017-0625-1.

102. Kuczera D, Assolini JP, Tomiotto–Pellissier F, et al. Highlights for dengue immunopathogenesis: Antibody-dependent enhancement, cytokine storm, and beyond. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2018;38(2):69–80. DOI: 10.1089/JIR.2017.0037.

103. Paixão ES, Teixeira MG, Costa M da CN, et al. Symptomatic dengue during pregnancy and congenital neurologic nalformations. Emerg Infect Dis 2018;24(9):1748–1750. DOI: 10.3201/EID2409.170361.

104. Hung LP, Nghi TD, Anh NH, et al. Case report: Postpartum hemorrhage associated with dengue with warning signs in a term pregnancy and delivery. F1000Res 2015;4:1483. DOI: 10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.7589.1.

105. Rothman AL. Immunity to dengue virus: A tale of original antigenic sin and tropical cytokine storms. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11(8):532–543. DOI: 10.1038/NRI3014.

106. World Health Organixzation. National guidelines for clinical management of dengue fever. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/208893. Accessed on: 18 December 2022.

107. Kumar R, Tripathi S, Tambe JJ, et al. Dengue encephalopathy in children in Northern India: Clinical features and comparison with non dengue. J Neurol Sci 2008;269(1–2):41–48. DOI: 10.1016/J.JNS.2007.12.018.

108. Swaminathan A, Kirupanandhan S, Rathnavelu E. Case report: Challenges in a unique presentation of congenital dengue with congenital heart disease. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12(6). DOI: 10.1136/BCR-2018-228855.

109. Prompetchara E, Ketloy C, Thomas SJ, et al. Dengue vaccine: Global development update. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2020; 38(3):178–185.DOI: 10.12932/AP-100518-0309.

110. Nguyen TM, Huan VT, Reda A, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of neonatal dengue at the Children’s Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. J Clin Virol 2021;138:104758. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCV.2021.104758.

111. Thomas SJ, Rothman AL. Trials and tribulations on the path to developing a dengue vaccine. Vaccine 2015;33(Suppl. 4):D24–D31. DOI: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2015.05.095.

112. Precioso AR, Palacios R, Thomé B, et al. Clinical evaluation strategies for a live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine. Vaccine 2015;33(50):7121–7125. DOI: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2015.09.105.

113. Basurko C, Everhard S, Matheus S, et al. A prospective matched study on symptomatic dengue in pregnancy. PLoS One 2018;13(10):e0202005. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0202005.

114. Vouga M, Chiu YC, Pomar L, et al. Dengue, Zika and chikungunya during pregnancy: Pre- and post-travel advice and clinical management. J Travel Med 2019;26(8):taz077. DOI: 10.1093/JTM/TAZ077.

115. Vázquez S, Lemos G, Pupo M, et al. Diagnosis of dengue virus infection by the visual and simple AuBioDOT immunoglobulin M capture system. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003;10(6):1074–1077. DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.10.6.1074-1077.2003.

116. Wang SM, Sekaran SD. Early diagnosis of dengue infection using a commercial dengue duo rapid test kit for the detection of NS1, IGM, and IGG. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010;83(3):690–695. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.2010.10-0117.

117. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Serologic tests for dengue virus. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/dengue/healthcare-providers/testing/serologic-tests.html. Accessed on: 9 June 2023.

118. Lukman N, Salim G, Kosasih H, et al. Comparison of the hemagglutination inhibition Test and IgG ELISA in Categorizing Primary and Secondary Dengue Infections Based on the Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:5253842. DOI: 10.1155/2016/5253842.

119. Tesh RB. A method for the isolation and identification of dengue viruses, using mosquito cell cultures. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1979;28(6):1053–1059. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.1979.28.1053.

120. Muller DA, Depelsenaire ACI, Young PR. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of dengue virus infection. J Infect Dis 2017;215(Suppl. 2):S89–S95. DOI: 10.1093/INFDIS/JIW649.

121. Rosen L, Shroyer DA. Comparative susceptibility of five species of Toxorhynchites mosquitoes to parenteral infection with dengue and other flaviviruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1985;34(4):805–809. DOI: 10.4269/AJTMH.1985.34.805.

122. Choy MM, Gubler DJ. Isolation and titration of dengue viruses by the mosquito inoculation technique. Methods Mol Biol 2014;1138:15–25. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0348-1_2/FIGURES/6.

123. Soni BK, Das DSR, George RA, et al. MRI features in dengue encephalitis: A case series in South Indian tertiary care hospital. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017;27(2):125. DOI: 10.4103/IJRI.IJRI_322_16.

124. Dudipala SC, Mandapuram P, Chinma LK. Dengue encephalitis in children “not an uncommon entity but is rarely thought of”: A case report. J Pediatr Neurosci 2020;15(3):301–303. DOI: 10.4103/JPN.JPN_7_20.

125. Carod–Artal FJ, Wichmann O, Farrar J, et al. Neurological complications of dengue virus infection. Lancet Neurol 2013;12(9):906–919. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70150-9.

126. Kennedy PGE. Viral encephalitis: Causes, differential diagnosis, and management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75 Suppl. 1(Suppl. 1):i10-5. DOI: 10.1136/JNNP.2003.034280.

127. Soares CN, Faria LC, Peralta JM, et al. Dengue infection: Neurological manifestations and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. J Neurol Sci 2006;249(1):19–24. DOI: 10.1016/J.JNS.2006.05.068.

128. Weerasinghe WS, Medagama A. Dengue hemorrhagic fever presenting as encephalitis: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2019;13(1). DOI: 10.1186/S13256-019-2201-X.

129. Soares C, Puccioni–Sohler M. Dengue encephalitis: Suggestion for case definition. J Neurol Sci 2011;306(1–2):165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.04.010.

130. Clé M, Eldin P, Briant L, et al. Neurocognitive impacts of arbovirus infections. J Neuroinflammation 2020;17(1):1–14. DOI: 10.1186/S12974-020-01904-3/FIGURES/2.

131. Vyas S, Ray N, Maralakunte M, et al. Pattern recognition approach to brain MRI findings in patients with dengue fever with neurological complications. Neurol India 2020;68(5):1038–1047. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.294556.

132. Lnu P, Sehgal V, Sehgal LB, et al. The spectrum of MRI findings in dengue encephalitis. Cureus 2022;14(9):e29048. DOI: 10.7759/CUREUS.29048.

133. Purohit D, Dhingra N, Dutt R, et al. Anti-DENV and anti-dengue vector activity of some heterocyclic scaffolds. Mini Rev Med Chem 2020;20(12):1062–1071. DOI: 10.2174/1389557520666200414162408.

134. Wills BA, Dung NM, Loan HT, et al. Comparison of three fluid solutions for resuscitation in dengue shock syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005;353(9):877–889. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA044057.

135. Dung NM, Day NPJ, Tam DTH, et al. Fluid replacement in dengue shock syndrome: A randomized, double-blind comparison of four intravenous-fluid regimens. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29(4):787–794. DOI: 10.1086/520435.

136. Ngo NT, Phuong CXT, Kneen R, et al. Acute management of dengue shock syndrome: A randomized double-blind comparison of 4 intravenous fluid regimens in the first hour. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32(2):204–213. DOI: 10.1086/318479.

137. Lye DC, Lee VJ, Sun Y, et al. Lack of efficacy of prophylactic platelet transfusion for severe thrombocytopenia in adults with acute uncomplicated dengue infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009;48(9):1262–1265. DOI: 10.1086/597773/2/48-9-1262-TBL001.GIF.

138. Arragain L, Dupont–Rouzeyrol M, O’Connor O, et al. Vertical transmission of dengue virus in the peripartum period and viral kinetics in newborns and breast milk: New data. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2017;6(4):324–331. DOI: 10.1093/JPIDS/PIW058.

139. Morniroli D, Consales A, Crippa BL, et al. The antiviral properties of human milk: A multitude of defence tools from mother nature. Nutrients 2021;13(2):1–7. DOI: 10.3390/NU13020694.

140. Panpanich R, Sornchai P, Kanjanaratanakorn K. Corticosteroids for treating dengue shock syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(3):CD003488. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003488.PUB2.

141. Tam DTH, Ngoc TV, Tien NTH, et al. Effects of short-course oral corticosteroid therapy in early dengue infection in Vietnamese patients: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55(9):1216–1224. DOI: 10.1093/CID/CIS655.

142. Zhang F, Kramer CV. Corticosteroids for dengue infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014(7):CD003488. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003488.PUB3.

143. Dimaano EM, Saito M, Honda S, et al. Lack of efficacy of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of severe thrombocytopenia in patients with secondary dengue virus infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007;77(6):1135–1138.

144. Chuansumrit A, Wangruangsatid S, Lektrakul Y, et al. Control of bleeding in children with dengue hemorrhagic fever using recombinant activated factor VII: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2005; 16(8):549–555.DOI: 10.1097/01.MBC.0000186837.78432.2F.

145. Salgado D, Zabaleta TE, Hatch S, et al. Use of pentoxifylline in treatment of children with dengue hemorrhagic fever. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012;31(7):771–773. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0B013E3182575E6A.

146. Noble CG, Shi PY. Structural biology of dengue virus enzymes: Towards rational design of therapeutics. Antiviral Res 2012; 96(2):115–126.DOI: 10.1016/J.ANTIVIRAL.2012.09.007.

147. Krishnan MN, Garcia–Blanco MA. Targeting host factors to treat West Nile and dengue viral infections. Viruses 2014;6(2):683–708. DOI: 10.3390/V6020683.

148. Nguyen NM, Tran CNB, Phung LK, et al. A randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial of balapiravir, a polymerase inhibitor, in adult dengue patients. J Infect Dis 2013;207(9):1442–1450. DOI: 10.1093/INFDIS/JIS470.

149. Low JG, Sung C, Wijaya L, et al. Efficacy and safety of celgosivir in patients with dengue fever (CELADEN): A phase 1b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14(8):706–715. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70730-3.

150. Whitehorn J, Nguyen CVV, Khanh LP, et al. Lovastatin for the treatment of adult patients with dengue: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62(4):468–476. DOI: 10.1093/CID/CIV949.

151. Razak A, Nagesh NK. Acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis in a neonate secondary to dengue infection. Indian Pediatr 2015;52(6):534. PMID: 26121739.

152. Chaturvedi UC, Dhawan R, Khanna M, et al. Breakdown of the blood–brain barrier during dengue virus infection of mice. J Gen Virol 1991;72(Pt 4)(4):859–866. DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-4-859.

153. Castanha PMS, Braga C, Cordeiro MT, et al. Placental transfer of dengue virus (DENV)-specific antibodies and kinetics of DENV infection-enhancing activity in Brazilian infants. J Infect Dis 2016;214(2):265–272. DOI: 10.1093/INFDIS/JIW143.

154. Srivastava G, Chhavi N. Dengue encephalitis and dengue hepatitis in an Infant. Neurol India 2022;70(2):790. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.344599.

155. Kumar AS, Mehta S, Singh P, et al. Dengue encephalitis: “Double doughnut” sign. Neurol India 2017;65(3):670. DOI: 10.4103/NEUROINDIA.NI_723_16.

156. Kalane SU, Gokhale AN, Kalane UD. Dengue Encephalitis in a newborn. Indian J Pediatr 2021;88(7):716. DOI: 10.1007/S12098-021-03791-9.

157. Qiu M, Zhao L, Zhang J, et al. Effective infection with dengue virus in experimental neonate and adult mice through the intranasal route. Viruses 2022;14(7):1394. DOI: 10.3390/V14071394.

158. Paul AM, Acharya D, Duty L, et al. Osteopontin facilitates West Nile virus neuroinvasion via neutrophil “Trojan horse” transport. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):4722–4722. DOI: 10.1038/S41598-017-04839-7.

159. Verma S, Lo Y, Chapagain M, et al. West Nile virus infection modulates human brain microvascular endothelial cells tight junction proteins and cell adhesion molecules: Transmigration across the in vitro blood–brain barrier. Virology 2009; 385(2):425–433.DOI: 10.1016/J.VIROL.2008.11.047.

160. Rather IA, Parray HA, Lone JB, et al. Prevention and control strategies to counter dengue virus infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017;7:336. DOI: 10.3389/FCIMB.2017.00336.

161. Endy TP, Nisalak A, Chunsuttitwat S, et al. Relationship of preexisting dengue virus (DV) neutralizing antibody levels to viremia and severity of disease in a prospective cohort study of DV infection in Thailand. J Infect Dis 2004;189(6):990–1000. DOI: 10.1086/382280.

162. Guy B, Guirakhoo F, Barban V, et al. Preclinical and clinical development of YFV 17D-based chimeric vaccines against dengue, West Nile and Japanese encephalitis viruses. Vaccine 2010; 28(3):632–649.DOI: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2009.09.098.

163. Thomas SJ, Yoon IK. A review of Dengvaxia®: Development to deployment. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019;15(10):2295–2314. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1658503.

164. Capeding MR, Tran NH, Hadinegoro SRS, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of a novel tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children in Asia: A phase 3, randomised, observer-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2014;384(9951):1358–1365. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61060-6.

165. Villar L, Dayan GH, Arredondo–García JL, et al. Efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in children in Latin America. N Engl J Med 2015;372(2):113–123. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1411037.

166. World Health Organization. Vaccines and immunization: Dengue. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/dengue-vaccines. Accessed on: 18 December 2022.

167. Sáez–Llorens X, Tricou V, Yu D, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of one versus two doses of tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children aged 2–17 years in Asia and Latin America: 18-month interim data from a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18(2):162–170.DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30632-1.

168. Tricou V, Sáez–Llorens X, Yu D, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in children aged 2–17 years: A randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2020; 395(10234):1434–1443.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30556-0.

169. Biswal S, Reynales H, Saez–Llorens X, et al. Efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 2019;381(21):2009–2019. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1903869.

170. Biswal S, Borja–Tabora C, Vargas LM, et al. Efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children aged 4–16 years: A randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020;395(10234):1423–1433. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30414-1.

171. Iturbe–Ormaetxe I, Walker T, O’Neill SL. Wolbachia and the biological control of mosquito-borne disease. EMBO Rep 2011;12(6):508–518. DOI: 10.1038/EMBOR.2011.84.

172. Lambrechts L, Ferguson NM, Harris E, et al. Assessing the epidemiological effect of Wolbachia for dengue control. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15(7):862–866. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00091-2.

173. Ryan PA, Turley AP, Wilson G, et al. Establishment of w Mel Wolbachia in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and reduction of local dengue transmission in Cairns and surrounding locations in northern Queensland, Australia. Gates Open Res 2020;3:1547. DOI: 10.12688/GATESOPENRES.13061.2.

174. Flores HA, de Bruyne JT, O’Donnell TB, et al. Multiple Wolbachia strains provide comparative levels of protection against dengue virus infection in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog 2020;16(4):e1008433. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1008433.

175. Cruz–Oliveira C, Freire JM, Conceição TM, et al. Receptors and routes of dengue virus entry into the host cells. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2015;39(2):155–170. DOI: 10.1093/FEMSRE/FUU004.

176. Dejarnac O, Hafirassou ML, Chazal M, et al. TIM-1 ubiquitination mediates dengue virus entry. Cell Rep 2018;23(6):1779–1793. DOI: 10.1016/J.CELREP.2018.04.013.

177. Kuhn RJ, Zhang W, Rossmann MG, et al. Structure of dengue virus: Implications for flavivirus organization, maturation, and fusion. Cell 2002;108(5):717–725. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00660-8.

178. Wong SS, Haqshenas G, Gowans EJ, et al. The dengue virus M protein localises to the endoplasmic reticulum and forms oligomers. FEBS Lett 2012;586(7):1032–1037. DOI: 10.1016/J.FEBSLET.2012.02.047.

179. Luangtrakool P, Vejbaesya S, Luangtrakool K, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related A and B (MICA and MICB) gene, allele, and haplotype associations with dengue infections in ethnic Thais. J Infect Dis 2020;222(5):840–846. DOI: 10.1093/INFDIS/JIAA134.

180. Xu T, Sampath A, Chao A, et al. Structure of the dengue virus helicase/nucleoside triphosphatase catalytic domain at a resolution of 2.4 A. J Virol 2005; 79(16):10278–10288.DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.16.10278-10288.2005.

181. Mosquera JA, Hernandez JP, Valero N, et al. Ultrastructural studies on dengue virus type 2 infection of cultured human monocytes. Virol J 2005;2:26. DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-26

182. Yap TL, Xu T, Chen YL, et al. Crystal structure of the dengue virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase catalytic domain at 1.85-angstrom resolution. J Virol 2007; 81(9):4753–4765.DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02283-06.

183. You S, Falgout B, Markoff L, et al. In vitro RNA synthesis from exogenous dengue viral RNA templates requires long range interactions between 5′- and 3′-terminal regions that influence RNA structure. J Biol Chem 2001;276(19):15581–15591. DOI: 10.1074/JBC.M010923200.

184. Nomaguchi M, Ackermann M, Yon C, et al. De novo synthesis of negative-strand RNA by Dengue virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase in vitro: Nucleotide, primer, and template parameters. J Virol 2003;77(16):8831–8842. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.16.8831-8842.2003.

185. Kapoor M, Zhang L, Ramachandra M, et al. Association between NS3 and NS5 proteins of dengue virus type 2 in the putative RNA replicase is linked to differential phosphorylation of NS5. J Biol Chem 1995;270(32):19100–19106. DOI: 10.1074/JBC.270.32.19100.

186. Bartholomeusz A, Thompson P. Flaviviridae polymerase and RNA replication. J Viral Hepat 1999;6(4):261–270. DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2893.1999.00173.X.

________________________
© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.